Wednesday, May 7, 2008

A Response to Frank Page: Restructuring of SBC Churches

Tony Kummer posted a telling article referring to some hard words from SBC president Frank Page. In response to Dr. Page, I am in total agreement with his statements. Too many in the SBC have been calling attention to the death grip held on traditions that no longer reflect the culture of the United States, much less global culture. The irony is that the very existence of the SBC is due to a passion for reaching the world for Christ, not just white anglo Americans from 1950.

“Many Southern Baptist churches are small groups of white people who are holding on [until] the end,” he said. “Not only have we not reached out to younger generations, but we have failed to reach out to other ethnic minorities who are all around us.”

Rather than embracing a “whatever it takes” mentality to change and restore a local church to health, Page said, many pastors and churches have “chosen to die rather than change, and they are doing it.”


I propose the following thoughts as a way to begin thinking about how to restructure churches in the SBC. It may be too late for some churches to adapt and so new church starts must begin. Unfortunately, the only answer to the dying SBC may be to tear down the old in order to build up the new.


The church is part of a congregation in a historical timeline that is past, present, and future. The biblical narrative from Genesis to Revelation shows God’s eternal essence from speaking all of creation into existence and the fulfilling of his salvation leading up to Jesus Christ. Throughout the biblical timeline, one sees the contribution of God’s people to styles of worship. This includes the heritage of the Abrahamic covenant as well as the Exodus experience of Passover and throughout the lament of the Psalms. Generations leading up to the New Testament church all contributed new forms of meeting and singing of new psalms; yet the traditions of their heritage were never abandoned. Whatever songs were inspired by new experiences seemed to fit right along with the traditional timeline. Nothing was taken away, but new things were folded in to the fabric of worship to the same God throughout history.

The church of the 21st century western context continues in this biblical heritage. Just as the Puritan founders held to their plain style of worship, the millennium generation of the west brings with it new music styles and images in worship. The problem of tradition has for the last thirty years or more butted head on with the problem of the immediate. Ken Myers, in his lecture on the problem of tradition, points out the difference one finds between songs that are handed down to those that are downloaded. Worship songs that are passed down from one generation to another have a sense of inheritance that the current method of download does not have. Inheritance has a greater value than instant commodity. This is the heart of the struggle of worship styles that lie along generational lines. An increased cultural diversity in the western context brings with it a renewed sense of blended culture that can be seen in the first century church world. Pastoral understanding will be crucial to bring harmony to the multiplicity of the generations and cultures.

Marva J. Dawn argues that the increased use of multi-media in western culture has also encroached into worship. Because the current era will be defined historically as the dawn of the digital age, it is not surprising that Christians will bring that culture with them in expression of worship. The expectations of a new generation are that worship should be as fast-paced and entertaining as the media to which they are accustomed. One of the strengths of media technology in worship is that imagery can be easily adapted as part of the worship experience. Likewise, the ease of displaying lyrics for worship focuses all participants to the same point in the worship space. Information can be shared in an entertaining way that keeps the attention of a new generation. A digital generation will bring with them that which shapes their contribution to history, namely their music and visual art. All of this can be adapted through digital media.

The danger comes when what is considered new is seen as a replacement for what is of the past. When tradition is thought of as outdated and unnecessary and must be replaced by the new and exciting, the ties that hold together historical Christian legacy come undone. The media itself is not the danger. Rather, the attitude behind its use is at fault. Genesis 25:29-34 warns through the story of Esau tossing away his birthright that heritage is precious and is not to be considered something to be traded for a menial bowl of lentil soup. Tradition has value.

One clear danger in current generational worship trends is the influence of image in contemporary culture dominating the word in Christian worship. Images themselves are not the danger. Church history is full of images. More than 70% of western art was created with a Christian influence for the church. Yet, for five centuries the Protestant tradition has seen very little emphasis on artistic contributions to the worship space.

Current generations have begun to revive the image in worship. The strength is in a renewed energy of creativity that has a strong tradition in the church. Yet the danger is in a return to abandonment of worship that is word-centered. Ken Myers points to this trend with words of caution. Images communicate differently than language. Pictures present themselves and nothing more. They cannot make an argument, come to a conclusion, make a demand, or judge a thought as true or false. They must be interpretive. Most modern people find it difficult to pay attention to long lectures. They lack the habits to do so and this has lead to the rise of fast-paced imagery in media. Entertainment now educates those who lack the mental ability to focus for more than seconds at a time. This straying away from a word-based intellect ties directly to a weakening of the Word of God in worship.

Visual images can aid an oral presentation, but there are more bad examples than successful ones. Yet, the balance of image and word can be found in this digital age and be part of a central style. Church congregations need not choose between a traditional style and a contemporary style. Contemporary worship can easily incorporate traditional songs and imagery of the faith in balance. By allowing the rich legacy of the church to become part of the present, new generations of Christians can make these traditions their own in a new and exciting way. Likewise, tradition can embrace the energetic contributions of the present. Tradition brings wisdom and historical connection. New styles bring living vibrancy to the faith. Imagine today’s Christians contributing to the ongoing legacy of worship just as previous generations have done. The old and new can apply the richness of the word, through the lyrics and the sermon, into an arena where the digital age compliments the word rather than dominating. Likewise the word should inspire the digital media. As long as the Word of God is central to the worship experience, whether orally, musically, or visually, what is presented to God will be pleasing to him. In the end, this balance will only cause his children to bring the glory he so rightly deserves.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Albert Mohler on Beauty

Instantly, by affirming the unity of the transcendentals, we are required to see beauty fundamentally as a matter of truth to which taste is accountable, rather than a matter of taste to which truth is accountable.
— Dr. Albert Mohler, "A Christian Vision of Beauty," November 16, 2005

Monday, May 5, 2008

Bonhoeffer on Cantus Firmus


There is always the danger in all strong, erotic love that one may love what I might call the polyphony of life. What I mean is that God wants us to love him eternally with our whole hearts - not in such a way as to injure or weaken our earthly love, but to provide a kind of cantus firmus to which the other melodies of life provide the counterpoint...

Only a polyphony of this kind can give life a wholeness and at the same time assure us that nothing calamitous can happen as long as the cantus firmus is kept going.


- Dietrich Bonhoffer, from Letters and Papers from Prison

A cantus firmus is a musical term referring to a fixed song within a pre-existing melody forming the basis of a polyphonic composition.

---
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, The Enlarged Edition, ed. Eberhard Bethge, London, SCM Press, 1971.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Piper Quote on Beauty and God's Glory

His holiness is His intrinsic worth - an utterly unique excellence.
His glory is the manifest display of this worth in beauty.
His glory is His holiness on display.



John Piper
Brothers, We Are Not Professionals
p 13

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Beauty of the Cross: A Book Review


THE BEAUTY OF THE CROSS: THE PASSION OF CHRIST IN THEOLOGY AND
THE ARTS, FROM THE CATACOMBS TO THE EVE OF THE RENAISSANCE



Viladesau, Richard. The Beauty of the Cross; The Passion of Christ in Theology and the Arts, from the Catacombs to the Eve of the Renaissance. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 214 pp. $39.95.


Introduction

The Beauty of the Cross is primarily a work in systematic theology rather than one of art history. Richard Viladesau’s purpose is to explore the specific problem of the Christian perception of the cross by focusing on thoughts surrounding Christ’s suffering and death as a salvific event. From its inception, Christianity has always been distinguished as the religio cruces — the religion of the cross (7). He explores theological paradigms involving interpretation of the cross as key aspects of Christian soteriology as illustrated within artistic styles during theological periods of Christian history. It is an examination of the cross as the dominant symbol of the Christian faith from the first century to the end of the medieval period. Art produced during these times can be linked to the influence of the theology of each period. This exploration of the important connection between theology and the arts shows how theology can influence culture. Evangelical Christians gain insight into how the first centuries of the church grappled with and expressed their connection to the events of Christ’s passion. Christianity is a present faith for today’s people and culture. Those who strive to model Christ after patristic fathers of the church should find this volume refreshing. Not only is theological attitudes of the period thoroughly presented, the expression of faith through the arts shows a glimpse of how the culture of the day lived out the consequences of Christ’s passion.

Summary

Richard Viladesau has produced a study of the concept and symbolism of Christ’s cross in both theology and imagination. Visual imagery from the mind is a natural accompaniment to the written word. The theology of Christ’s passion involves both concept and aesthetic meditations and has changed throughout various historical contexts. Viladesau looks at church history and art history by means of systematic theology. His method involves examining the connection between aesthetic and conceptual theologies through the crucifix as seen in the New Testament period, Romanesque period, Medieval and Gothic periods in order to deepen the understanding of soteriology.

Viladesau
’s thesis is that the church’s understanding of faith was reflected in artistic methods of thinking and communication along with the written text (4). Christianity has always held an aesthetic theology alongside Scripture in that the theology in each period of church history existed, “in both conceptual/theoretical and aesthetic mediations.” (6). The grotesque nature of the cross is the very center of the tension this symbol brings to the faith. On one hand, crucifixion is an ugly act, yet in Christ’s death on the cross, comes a new life that is beautiful. Portraying life and death at the same time is a theological dilemma. In Christ’s death, there begins a new life. Death and life are different, yet the same (52-53).

The cross has not lost its offensive nature to those outside the Christian tradition today. The broken body of Christ to many represents the opposite of salvation. Indian saints, Sunni Muslims, and Jews, see God’s peace coming to those who do not suffer. For Jews especially, the cross is an offensive symbol of a history of persecution (8). Many in the emerging church today promote the idea that the idea of the bloody sacrifice on the Cross is nothing more than “cosmic child abuse.” Steve Chalke writes, “The fact is that the cross isn’t a form of cosmic child abuse—a vengeful Father, punishing his Son for an offence he has not even committed. Understandably, both people inside and outside of the Church have found this twisted version of events morally dubious and a huge barrier to faith.” Viladesau shows how many post-Christians in today’s culture see the cross as a symbol of the burden of guilt-feelings and masochism that Christianity imposes on others. His example is the 1996 crucifixion collage of contemporary artist Tammy Anderson. It is just as important to today as in any period of Church history for Christians to reflect on how the theology the cross is salvific and how it represents the wisdom and power of God (8).

Agreement with Viladesau’s study

Viladesau begins his exploration by showing how offensive the crucifixion has always been with an early crucifixion image of The Graffito of Alexamenos. In this primitive wall drawing, Christ is portrayed with the head of a donkey. The degradation of Christ is obvious as the inscription with the piece reads, “Alexamenos worships God.” (18-19). Yet Christianity embraces the mockery and glorifies Christ through the oppression. During the earliest years of the church, the patriarchal fathers founded the theology that Christ’s death paid a debt he did not owe so that the death all sinners owed God would do them no harm (32). The ridicule of the crucifixion was portrayed in music, art, and liturgy as a triumph over death something those who were not believers could never understand and thus ridiculed. Augustine’s writings on the crucifixion set the foundation for a patristic theology recognizing Christ’s sacrifice as “the great price with which Christ bought us” (32).

As the portrayal of the crucifixion became more commonplace, the depiction of Christ took on the role of victory. From the beautiful Christ of the fifth century to the Syrian style Jesus, depictions of Jesus took on theological as well as cultural meanings of triumph (44-45). During the Byzantine era frescos and mosaic art began to portray Christ as dead, or dying, on the cross. The doctrinal influence on these images indicated that to see Christ as dead on the cross was to affirm the reality of the incarnation. This was a direct contradiction against Docetism and Monophysitism. To represent the death of Christ was a theological stand against the errors of the Docetistic heresies of the day 48-49).

To the medieval mindset, the notion of betrayal was too horrendous to comprehend. In Dante's Inferno the very mouth of Satan, the deepest center of Hell, was reserved for those who would betray Jesus. This was the punishment waiting for Judas. The natural horror and shame at the betrayal of a friend was reinforced by social structure. The feudal system of the medieval period was entirely based on personal loyalty. Bonaventure understood sin precisely in this context. His theology states that sin is not merely disobedience, it is personal betrayal of a friend and benefactor (107).

Viladesau presents well the meaning behind the images of art history giving greater insight into the art itself. Art historians are now presented with clear evidence that art does have purpose other than a contemporary viewer’s interpretation. The artists and craftsmen throughout Christian history saw their art and their every day living as integrated as glorifying Christ. Viladesau effectively shows transitions of theology from one period to the next in a way that shows how theology of the church changed, yet strengthened, in deeper conviction. The art, music and liturgy that came out of these convictions stand as testaments to the sincerity of these beliefs as Christians lived out their lives and faced daily challenges. From the mockery faced during the first centuries, to the black death of the medieval period, Viladesau shows that depictions of Christ’s passion coincided with the struggles faced by Christians. They turned to Christ for solace and expressed Christ’s solidarity with them through their art.

Disagreement with Viladesau’s study

The historical timeline of this book covers Christianity from the earliest days of the New Testament through the theological decline of the late medieval period. Viladesau never acknowledges the over dependence on images that in large part led to the iconoclasm of Protestant Reformation. His failure to acknowledge the spiritual decline of the late medieval church is a failure in the study of the shift of focus of many medieval church leaders culminating with Martin Luther’s 95 theses in 1517. The corruption of indulgences during this period was fueled by the desire for richer church architecture and art. Relics housed in ornate reliquaries supported an economic culture centered on dangerous Christian theology.

Viladesau
also never returns to the concept introduced in the first chapter about those who find the cross offensive. There are no concluding thoughts as to how those offended, from other religions to post-Christians in contemporary western culture, can benefit from this aesthetic study of the cross. Surely a few opinions could be changed by this thorough investigation into the theology behind much of the images of Christ’s crucifixion. There is potential for evangelism to an image rich culture and this type of study would be an invaluable tool. Although he admittedly proclaims that this study is intended for artists and scholars contemplating theology, what is lacking are his connecting thoughts on how his study will influence post-Christians and other world religions who are opposed to the ideas they feel the cross represents. Instead readers are left to apply the information in forms unintended by the author.


Recommendation

The Beauty of the Cross is intended for serious art scholars, artists wondering about theology, and theologians who are curious about but have little background in the arts. This is the beginning of a long study on the creative expression of Christ’s suffering on the cross through the arts. This volume ends with the limited introduction to the early years of the Renaissance and the Reformation. The author admits to this stopping point and confesses to the need of a new volume rather than just another chapter in order to do justice to the wealth of advancement in the arts during the Renaissance (Preface viii, 173).

The Triumph of the Cross: The Passion of Christ in Theology and the Arts from the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation
is Viladesau’s continuation of his study of theology and the arts as it is related to the cross. Readers of The Beauty of the Cross will be inspired to continue the journey with The Triumph of the Cross just released April 22, 2008 (the same day as the delivery of this review).

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Augustine on Beauty


If the things of this world delight you, praise God for them but turn your love away from them and give it to their Maker, so that in the things that please you you may not displease him...The good things which you love are all from God, but they are good and sweet only as long as they are used to do his will. They will rightly turn bitter if God is spurned and the things that come from him are wrongly loved.
— St. Augustine, Confessions
---
Saint Augustine, Confessions, trans. R.S. Pine-Coffin (London: Penguin Books, 1961), 82.